FRCS Paediatric Ortho — improved notes
FRCS Paediatric Ortho — visual inline notes

021. Fibular hemimelia

visual-inline rebuild1 extracted figuresspeaker notes XML54 study lines3 Q&A

Individual slide images have been cropped from the rendered slide and inserted beside the matching note section. The full slide remains below only for layout/audit.

Clean FRCS notes with inline figures

Fibular hemimelia

•Clinical photo showing patient standing
•Abnormalities seen over left lower limb
•LLD: tibia shorter
•Knee: valgus +/- patella subluxed
•Tibia: AM bowing, anterior scars over tibia (small, longitudinal, ?ext fix), lateral and medial scars over proximal tibia and distal femur (?previous epiphysiodesis)
•Ankle: Valgus
•Foot: Missing 5th toe, hypoplastic foot and lateral rays
•Suspect patient has fibular hemimelia (or fibular deficiency)

Differentials include trauma, tumour and infection (unlikely)


Start with history and physical examination

Clinical photograph - fibular hemimelia clinical photograph
Fig 1. Clinical photograph - fibular hemimelia clinical photographtop left
•To establish diagnosis, rule out associated problems, delineate current symptoms, also need to know previous treatment

PE to look for other associated abnormalities:

•LLD
•Hip: PFFD, coxa vara
•Knee: hypoplastic lateral femoral condyle, genu valgus, patella instability, ACL deficiency
•Tibia: Anteromedial bowing, multiple surgical scars
•F&A: ankle instability secondary to ball and socket ankle, talipes equinovalgus, tarsal coalition, missing lateral toes
•Scannogram

Radiographic classification by Achterman

Management

•Treatment Goal is to provide a plantigrade foot, stable ankle, and achieve equality of leg length, and to correct the tibial deformity to allow for more efficient gait
•If LLD >20cm at maturity, foot to level of mid tibia or femur <50% of other leg → ablation
•I will use Birch classification to guide my management
•Depends on whether the 1. foot is functional or not, and 2. degree of LLD

If LLD reconstructable, foot functional:

•Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD mild = shoe raise and brace
•Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD <5cm = contralateral epiphysiodesis
•Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD >5cm but <30% = ipsilateral tibial lengthening
•LLD >30% = Amputation (or multiple lengthening)
•Foot non function foot / ankle unreconstructable / LLD significant
•Syme amputation if UL function ok
•Consider multiple reconstruction if poor UL function
•RECONSTRUCTION

Components:

•1. LLD
•2. Tibial bow correction
•3. Knee recon
•4. Ankle recon (soft tissue: peroneal longus release, bone: mild - MM epiphysiodesis, moderate - supramalleolar osteotomy, severe – Gruca recon (oblique sliding osteotomy → new LM)

•fibular hemimelia
•Most common congenital long bone deficiency
•Post axial longitudinal def
•Swanson: failure of formation, problem with AER, occurs in 1st trimester

Classified by Achterman & Kalamchi (based on amount of fibular present)

Type / groupDefinition / note
Type 1AA portion of fibula remains present but proximal fibular epiphysis is distal to level of proximal tibial physis while distal fibula physis is proximal to the tibial plafond
Type 1Bpartial absence (30-50% length), distal unable to support ankle joint
Type 2absent fibula

Normal length of fibula:

•Proximal fibular epiphysis → proximal tibial physis
•Distal fibular physis → distal tibial plafond
•Treatment depends on the severity of LLD at maturity and stability of ankle joint
•if LLD at maturity > 30% or unstable ankle joint → symes amputation (88% satisfactory vs lengthening ~50%)

Direct Q&A

Q1 What diagnostic or radiographic findings support Fibular hemimelia?

Fibular hemimelia

•Clinical photo showing patient standing
•Abnormalities seen over left lower limb
•LLD: tibia shorter
•Knee: valgus +/- patella subluxed
•Tibia: AM bowing, anterior scars over tibia (small, longitudinal, ?ext fix), lateral and medial scars over proximal tibia and distal femur (?previous epiphysiodesis)
•Ankle: Valgus
•Foot: Missing 5th toe, hypoplastic foot and lateral rays
•Suspect patient has fibular hemimelia (or fibular deficiency)

Differentials include trauma, tumour and infection (unlikely)

Q2 What examination findings should be assessed in Fibular hemimelia?
•To establish diagnosis, rule out associated problems, delineate current symptoms, also need to know previous treatment
Q3 How is Fibular hemimelia managed?
•Treatment Goal is to provide a plantigrade foot, stable ankle, and achieve equality of leg length, and to correct the tibial deformity to allow for more efficient gait
•If LLD >20cm at maturity, foot to level of mid tibia or femur <50% of other leg → ablation
•I will use Birch classification to guide my management
•Depends on whether the 1. foot is functional or not, and 2. degree of LLD

Raw speaker-note hierarchy audit

#lvlmarLindentlogicaloriginal note line
10NoneNone0Fibular hemimelia
20NoneNone0Clinical photo showing patient standing
30NoneNone0Abnormalities seen over left lower limb
41628650-1714502LLD: tibia shorter
51628650-1714502Knee: valgus +/- patella subluxed
61628650-1714502Tibia: AM bowing, anterior scars over tibia (small, longitudinal, ?ext fix), lateral and medial scars over proximal tibia and distal femur (?previous epiphysiodesis)
71628650-1714502Ankle: Valgus
81628650-1714502Foot: Missing 5th toe, hypoplastic foot and lateral rays
90NoneNone0Suspect patient has fibular hemimelia (or fibular deficiency)
100NoneNone0Differentials include trauma, tumour and infection (unlikely)
110NoneNone0------------------------------------------------------------------
120NoneNone0Start with history and physical examination
130NoneNone0To establish diagnosis, rule out associated problems, delineate current symptoms, also need to know previous treatment
140NoneNone0PE to look for other associated abnormalities:
150228600-2286001LLD
160228600-2286001Hip: PFFD, coxa vara
170228600-2286001Knee: hypoplastic lateral femoral condyle, genu valgus, patella instability, ACL deficiency
180228600-2286001Tibia: Anteromedial bowing, multiple surgical scars
190228600-2286001F&A: ankle instability secondary to ball and socket ankle, talipes equinovalgus, tarsal coalition, missing lateral toes
200NoneNone0Scannogram
210NoneNone0Radiographic classification by Achterman
220NoneNone0Mx:
230NoneNone0Treatment Goal is to provide a plantigrade foot, stable ankle, and achieve equality of leg length, and to correct the tibial deformity to allow for more efficient gait
240NoneNone0If LLD >20cm at maturity, foot to level of mid tibia or femur <50% of other leg → ablation
250NoneNone0I will use Birch classification to guide my management
260NoneNone0Depends on whether the 1. foot is functional or not, and 2. degree of LLD
270NoneNone0If LLD reconstructable, foot functional:
280171450-1714501Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD mild = shoe raise and brace
290171450-1714501Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD <5cm = contralateral epiphysiodesis
300171450-1714501Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD >5cm but <30% = ipsilateral tibial lengthening
310171450-1714501LLD >30% = Amputation (or multiple lengthening)
320NoneNone0Foot non function foot / ankle unreconstructable / LLD significant
330171450-1714501Syme amputation if UL function ok
340171450-1714501Consider multiple reconstruction if poor UL function
350NoneNone0RECONSTRUCTION
360NoneNone0Components:
3700001. LLD
3800002. Tibial bow correction
390NoneNone03. Knee recon
400NoneNone04. Ankle recon (soft tissue: peroneal longus release, bone: mild - MM epiphysiodesis, moderate - supramalleolar osteotomy, severe – Gruca recon (oblique sliding osteotomy → new LM)
410NoneNone0----------------------------------------------------------
420NoneNone0Tell me about fibular hemimelia
430NoneNone0Most common congenital long bone deficiency
440NoneNone0Post axial longitudinal def
450NoneNone0Swanson: failure of formation, problem with AER, occurs in 1st trimester
460000Classified by Achterman & Kalamchi (based on amount of fibular present)
471NoneNone1Type 1A: A portion of fibula remains present but proximal fibular epiphysis is distal to level of proximal tibial physis while distal fibula physis is proximal to the tibial plafond
481NoneNone1Type 1B: partial absence (30-50% length), distal unable to support ankle joint
491NoneNone1Type 2: absent fibula
500NoneNone0Normal length of fibula:
510171450-1714501Proximal fibular epiphysis -> proximal tibial physis
520171450-1714501Distal fibular physis -> distal tibial plafond
530NoneNone0Treatment depends on the severity of LLD at maturity and stability of ankle joint
540NoneNone0if LLD at maturity > 30% or unstable ankle joint → symes amputation (88% satisfactory vs lengthening ~50%)

Improved semantic hierarchy used for the study notes

#semantic levelsection?rewritten line
10Fibular hemimelia
21Clinical photo showing patient standing
31Abnormalities seen over left lower limb
42LLD: tibia shorter
52Knee: valgus +/- patella subluxed
62Tibia: AM bowing, anterior scars over tibia (small, longitudinal, ?ext fix), lateral and medial scars over proximal tibia and distal femur (?previous epiphysiodesis)
72Ankle: Valgus
82Foot: Missing 5th toe, hypoplastic foot and lateral rays
91Suspect patient has fibular hemimelia (or fibular deficiency)
100yesDifferentials include trauma, tumour and infection (unlikely)
110——
120yesStart with history and physical examination
131To establish diagnosis, rule out associated problems, delineate current symptoms, also need to know previous treatment
140yesPE to look for other associated abnormalities:
151LLD
161Hip: PFFD, coxa vara
171Knee: hypoplastic lateral femoral condyle, genu valgus, patella instability, ACL deficiency
181Tibia: Anteromedial bowing, multiple surgical scars
191F&A: ankle instability secondary to ball and socket ankle, talipes equinovalgus, tarsal coalition, missing lateral toes
201Scannogram
210yesRadiographic classification by Achterman
220yesManagement
231Treatment Goal is to provide a plantigrade foot, stable ankle, and achieve equality of leg length, and to correct the tibial deformity to allow for more efficient gait
241If LLD >20cm at maturity, foot to level of mid tibia or femur <50% of other leg → ablation
251I will use Birch classification to guide my management
261Depends on whether the 1. foot is functional or not, and 2. degree of LLD
270yesIf LLD reconstructable, foot functional:
281Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD mild = shoe raise and brace
291Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD <5cm = contralateral epiphysiodesis
301Foot functional =>3rays and ankle stable, LLD >5cm but <30% = ipsilateral tibial lengthening
311LLD >30% = Amputation (or multiple lengthening)
321Foot non function foot / ankle unreconstructable / LLD significant
331Syme amputation if UL function ok
341Consider multiple reconstruction if poor UL function
351RECONSTRUCTION
360yesComponents:
3711. LLD
3812. Tibial bow correction
3913. Knee recon
4014. Ankle recon (soft tissue: peroneal longus release, bone: mild - MM epiphysiodesis, moderate - supramalleolar osteotomy, severe – Gruca recon (oblique sliding osteotomy → new LM)
410——
421fibular hemimelia
431Most common congenital long bone deficiency
441Post axial longitudinal def
451Swanson: failure of formation, problem with AER, occurs in 1st trimester
460yesClassified by Achterman & Kalamchi (based on amount of fibular present)
471Type 1A: A portion of fibula remains present but proximal fibular epiphysis is distal to level of proximal tibial physis while distal fibula physis is proximal to the tibial plafond
481Type 1B: partial absence (30-50% length), distal unable to support ankle joint
491Type 2: absent fibula
500yesNormal length of fibula:
511Proximal fibular epiphysis → proximal tibial physis
521Distal fibular physis → distal tibial plafond
531Treatment depends on the severity of LLD at maturity and stability of ankle joint
541if LLD at maturity > 30% or unstable ankle joint → symes amputation (88% satisfactory vs lengthening ~50%)